rope: Optimize rope construction (#44345)

I have noticed you care about `SumTree` (and `Rope`) construction
performance, hence using rayon for parallelism and careful `Chunk`
splitting to avoid reallocation in `Rope::push`. It seemed strange to me
that using multi-threading is that beneficial there, so I tried to
investigate why the serial version (`SumTree::from_iter`) is slow in the
first place.

From my analysis I believe there are two main factors here:
1. `SumTree::from_iter` stores temporary `Node<T>` values in a vector
instead of heap-allocating them immediately and storing `SumTree<T>`
directly, as `SumTree::from_par_iter` does.
2. `Chunk::new` is quite slow: for some reason the compiler does not
vectorize it and seems to struggle to optimize u128 shifts (at least on
x86_64).

For (1) the solution is simple: allocate `Node<T>` immediately after
construction, just like `SumTree::from_par_iter`.
For (2) I was able to get better codegen by rewriting it into a simpler
per-byte loop and splitting computation into smaller chunks to avoid
slow u128 shifts.

There was a similar effort recently in #43193 using portable_simd
(currently nightly only) to optimize `Chunk::push_str`. From what I
understand from that discussion, you seem okay with hand-rolled SIMD for
specific architectures. If so, then I also provide sse2 implementation
for x86_64. Feel free to remove it if you think this is unnecessary.

To test performance I used a big CSV file (~1GB, mostly ASCII) and
measured `Rope::from` with this program:
```rust
fn main() {
    let text = std::fs::read_to_string("big.csv").unwrap();
    let start = std::time::Instant::now();
    let rope = rope::Rope::from(text);
    println!("{}ms, {}", start.elapsed().as_millis(), rope.len());
}
```

Here are results on my machine (Ryzen 7 4800H)

|              | Parallel | Serial |
| ------------ | -------- | ------ |
| Before       | 1123ms   | 9154ms |
| After        | 497ms    | 2081ms |
| After (sse2) | 480ms    | 1454ms |

Since serial performance is now much closer to parallel, I also
increased `PARALLEL_THRESHOLD` to 1000. In my tests the parallel version
starts to beat serial at around 150 KB strings. This constant might
require more tweaking and testing though, especially on ARM64.

<details>
<summary>cargo bench (SSE2 vs before)</summary>

```
     Running benches\rope_benchmark.rs (D:\zed\target\release\deps\rope_benchmark-3f8476f7dfb79154.exe)
Gnuplot not found, using plotters backend
push/4096               time:   [43.592 µs 43.658 µs 43.733 µs]
                        thrpt:  [89.320 MiB/s 89.473 MiB/s 89.610 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-78.523% -78.222% -77.854%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+351.56% +359.19% +365.61%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
  1 (1.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe
push/65536              time:   [632.36 µs 634.03 µs 635.76 µs]
                        thrpt:  [98.308 MiB/s 98.576 MiB/s 98.836 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-51.521% -50.850% -50.325%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+101.31% +103.46% +106.28%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 18 outliers among 100 measurements (18.00%)
  11 (11.00%) low mild
  6 (6.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe

append/4096             time:   [11.635 µs 11.664 µs 11.698 µs]
                        thrpt:  [333.92 MiB/s 334.89 MiB/s 335.72 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-24.543% -23.925% -22.660%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+29.298% +31.450% +32.525%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 12 outliers among 100 measurements (12.00%)
  2 (2.00%) low mild
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  8 (8.00%) high severe
append/65536            time:   [1.1287 µs 1.1324 µs 1.1360 µs]
                        thrpt:  [53.727 GiB/s 53.900 GiB/s 54.075 GiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-44.153% -37.614% -29.834%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+42.518% +60.292% +79.061%]
                        Performance has improved.

slice/4096              time:   [28.340 µs 28.372 µs 28.406 µs]
                        thrpt:  [137.52 MiB/s 137.68 MiB/s 137.83 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-8.0798% -6.3955% -4.4109%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+4.6145% +6.8325% +8.7900%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild
  1 (1.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe
slice/65536             time:   [527.51 µs 528.17 µs 528.90 µs]
                        thrpt:  [118.17 MiB/s 118.33 MiB/s 118.48 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-53.819% -45.431% -34.578%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+52.853% +83.256% +116.54%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low severe
  3 (3.00%) low mild
  1 (1.00%) high mild

bytes_in_range/4096     time:   [3.2545 µs 3.2646 µs 3.2797 µs]
                        thrpt:  [1.1631 GiB/s 1.1685 GiB/s 1.1721 GiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-3.4829% -2.4391% -1.7166%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+1.7466% +2.5001% +3.6085%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
  6 (6.00%) high mild
  2 (2.00%) high severe
bytes_in_range/65536    time:   [80.770 µs 80.832 µs 80.904 µs]
                        thrpt:  [772.52 MiB/s 773.21 MiB/s 773.80 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-1.8710% -1.3843% -0.9044%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+0.9126% +1.4037% +1.9067%]
                        Change within noise threshold.
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
  5 (5.00%) high mild
  3 (3.00%) high severe

chars/4096              time:   [790.50 ns 791.10 ns 791.88 ns]
                        thrpt:  [4.8173 GiB/s 4.8220 GiB/s 4.8257 GiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+0.4318% +1.4558% +2.0256%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-1.9854% -1.4349% -0.4299%]
                        Change within noise threshold.
Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low severe
  1 (1.00%) low mild
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  2 (2.00%) high severe
chars/65536             time:   [12.672 µs 12.688 µs 12.703 µs]
                        thrpt:  [4.8046 GiB/s 4.8106 GiB/s 4.8164 GiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-2.7794% -1.2987% -0.2020%] (p = 0.04 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+0.2025% +1.3158% +2.8588%]
                        Change within noise threshold.
Found 15 outliers among 100 measurements (15.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild
  12 (12.00%) high mild
  2 (2.00%) high severe

clip_point/4096         time:   [63.009 µs 63.126 µs 63.225 µs]
                        thrpt:  [61.783 MiB/s 61.880 MiB/s 61.995 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+2.0484% +3.2218% +5.2181%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-4.9593% -3.1213% -2.0073%]
                        Performance has regressed.
Found 13 outliers among 100 measurements (13.00%)
  12 (12.00%) low mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe
Benchmarking clip_point/65536: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Warning: Unable to complete 100 samples in 5.0s. You may wish to increase target time to 7.7s, enable flat sampling, or reduce sample count to 50.
clip_point/65536        time:   [1.2420 ms 1.2430 ms 1.2439 ms]
                        thrpt:  [50.246 MiB/s 50.283 MiB/s 50.322 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-0.3495% -0.0401% +0.1990%] (p = 0.80 > 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-0.1986% +0.0401% +0.3507%]
                        No change in performance detected.
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
  6 (6.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe

point_to_offset/4096    time:   [16.104 µs 16.119 µs 16.134 µs]
                        thrpt:  [242.11 MiB/s 242.33 MiB/s 242.56 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-1.3816% -0.2497% +2.2181%] (p = 0.84 > 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-2.1699% +0.2503% +1.4009%]
                        No change in performance detected.
Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%)
  3 (3.00%) low mild
  1 (1.00%) high mild
  2 (2.00%) high severe
point_to_offset/65536   time:   [356.28 µs 356.57 µs 356.86 µs]
                        thrpt:  [175.14 MiB/s 175.28 MiB/s 175.42 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-3.7072% -2.3338% -1.4742%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+1.4962% +2.3896% +3.8499%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild

cursor/4096             time:   [18.893 µs 18.934 µs 18.974 µs]
                        thrpt:  [205.87 MiB/s 206.31 MiB/s 206.76 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-2.3645% -2.0729% -1.7931%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+1.8259% +2.1168% +2.4218%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 12 outliers among 100 measurements (12.00%)
  12 (12.00%) high mild
cursor/65536            time:   [459.97 µs 460.40 µs 461.04 µs]
                        thrpt:  [135.56 MiB/s 135.75 MiB/s 135.88 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-5.7445% -4.2758% -3.1344%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+3.2358% +4.4668% +6.0946%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
  1 (1.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe

append many/small to large
                        time:   [38.364 ms 38.620 ms 38.907 ms]
                        thrpt:  [313.75 MiB/s 316.08 MiB/s 318.19 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-0.2042% +1.0954% +2.3334%] (p = 0.10 > 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-2.2802% -1.0836% +0.2046%]
                        No change in performance detected.
Found 21 outliers among 100 measurements (21.00%)
  9 (9.00%) high mild
  12 (12.00%) high severe
append many/large to small
                        time:   [48.045 ms 48.322 ms 48.648 ms]
                        thrpt:  [250.92 MiB/s 252.62 MiB/s 254.07 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-6.5298% -5.6919% -4.8532%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+5.1007% +6.0354% +6.9859%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 11 outliers among 100 measurements (11.00%)
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  9 (9.00%) high severe

```
</details>


Release Notes:

- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
This commit is contained in:
Vasyl Protsiv
2025-12-15 09:25:50 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 54c4302cdb
commit 6067436e9b
3 changed files with 62 additions and 23 deletions

View File

@@ -47,22 +47,59 @@ impl Chunk {
#[inline(always)]
pub fn new(text: &str) -> Self {
let mut this = Chunk::default();
this.push_str(text);
this
let text = ArrayString::from(text).unwrap();
const CHUNK_SIZE: usize = 8;
let mut chars_bytes = [0; MAX_BASE / CHUNK_SIZE];
let mut newlines_bytes = [0; MAX_BASE / CHUNK_SIZE];
let mut tabs_bytes = [0; MAX_BASE / CHUNK_SIZE];
let mut chars_utf16_bytes = [0; MAX_BASE / CHUNK_SIZE];
let mut chunk_ix = 0;
let mut bytes = text.as_bytes();
while !bytes.is_empty() {
let (chunk, rest) = bytes.split_at(bytes.len().min(CHUNK_SIZE));
bytes = rest;
let mut chars = 0;
let mut newlines = 0;
let mut tabs = 0;
let mut chars_utf16 = 0;
for (ix, &b) in chunk.iter().enumerate() {
chars |= (util::is_utf8_char_boundary(b) as u8) << ix;
newlines |= ((b == b'\n') as u8) << ix;
tabs |= ((b == b'\t') as u8) << ix;
// b >= 240 when we are at the first byte of the 4 byte encoded
// utf-8 code point (U+010000 or greater) it means that it would
// be encoded as two 16-bit code units in utf-16
chars_utf16 |= ((b >= 240) as u8) << ix;
}
chars_bytes[chunk_ix] = chars;
newlines_bytes[chunk_ix] = newlines;
tabs_bytes[chunk_ix] = tabs;
chars_utf16_bytes[chunk_ix] = chars_utf16;
chunk_ix += 1;
}
let chars = Bitmap::from_le_bytes(chars_bytes);
Chunk {
text,
chars,
chars_utf16: (Bitmap::from_le_bytes(chars_utf16_bytes) << 1) | chars,
newlines: Bitmap::from_le_bytes(newlines_bytes),
tabs: Bitmap::from_le_bytes(tabs_bytes),
}
}
#[inline(always)]
pub fn push_str(&mut self, text: &str) {
for (char_ix, c) in text.char_indices() {
let ix = self.text.len() + char_ix;
self.chars |= 1 << ix;
self.chars_utf16 |= 1 << ix;
self.chars_utf16 |= (c.len_utf16() as Bitmap) << ix;
self.newlines |= ((c == '\n') as Bitmap) << ix;
self.tabs |= ((c == '\t') as Bitmap) << ix;
}
self.text.push_str(text);
self.append(Chunk::new(text).as_slice());
}
#[inline(always)]

View File

@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ impl Rope {
#[cfg(all(test, not(rust_analyzer)))]
const PARALLEL_THRESHOLD: usize = 4;
#[cfg(not(all(test, not(rust_analyzer))))]
const PARALLEL_THRESHOLD: usize = 4 * (2 * sum_tree::TREE_BASE);
const PARALLEL_THRESHOLD: usize = 84 * (2 * sum_tree::TREE_BASE);
if new_chunks.len() >= PARALLEL_THRESHOLD {
self.chunks

View File

@@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ impl<T: Item> SumTree<T> {
<T::Summary as Summary>::add_summary(&mut summary, item_summary, cx);
}
nodes.push(Node::Leaf {
nodes.push(SumTree(Arc::new(Node::Leaf {
summary,
items,
item_summaries,
});
})));
}
let mut parent_nodes = Vec::new();
@@ -263,25 +263,27 @@ impl<T: Item> SumTree<T> {
height += 1;
let mut current_parent_node = None;
for child_node in nodes.drain(..) {
let parent_node = current_parent_node.get_or_insert_with(|| Node::Internal {
summary: <T::Summary as Summary>::zero(cx),
height,
child_summaries: ArrayVec::new(),
child_trees: ArrayVec::new(),
let parent_node = current_parent_node.get_or_insert_with(|| {
SumTree(Arc::new(Node::Internal {
summary: <T::Summary as Summary>::zero(cx),
height,
child_summaries: ArrayVec::new(),
child_trees: ArrayVec::new(),
}))
});
let Node::Internal {
summary,
child_summaries,
child_trees,
..
} = parent_node
} = Arc::get_mut(&mut parent_node.0).unwrap()
else {
unreachable!()
};
let child_summary = child_node.summary();
<T::Summary as Summary>::add_summary(summary, child_summary, cx);
child_summaries.push(child_summary.clone());
child_trees.push(Self(Arc::new(child_node)));
child_trees.push(child_node);
if child_trees.len() == 2 * TREE_BASE {
parent_nodes.extend(current_parent_node.take());
@@ -295,7 +297,7 @@ impl<T: Item> SumTree<T> {
Self::new(cx)
} else {
debug_assert_eq!(nodes.len(), 1);
Self(Arc::new(nodes.pop().unwrap()))
nodes.pop().unwrap()
}
}