Hi, this is a follow-up change for
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/41754 I think it important to
keep existing things working. So add notes to the Ruby extension doc
about enabling Ruby LSP for ERB files as well. Thanks!
Release Notes:
- N/A
- Adds a new action `git::PullRebase` which adds `--rebase` in the final
command invoked by existing Git-Pull implementation.
- Includes the new action in "Fetch/Push" button in the Git Panel
(screenshot below)
- Adds key-binding for `git::PullRebase` in all three platforms,
following the existing key-binding patterns (`ctrl-g shift-down`)
- Update git docs to include the new action.
Sidenote: This is my first ever OSS contribution
Screenshot:
<img width="234" height="215" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/713d068f-5ea5-444f-8d66-444ca65affc8"
/>
---
Release Notes:
- Git: Added `git: pull rebase` for running `git pull --rebase`.
## Add relative line numbers on wrapped lines, take 2
This is a rework of https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/39268
that excludes
e7096d27a6.
This commit introduced some line number rendering issues as described in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/41422.
While @ConradIrwin suggested we try to pass in the buffer rows from the
calling method instead of the snapshot, that
appears to have had unintended consequences and I don't think the two
calculations were intended to do the same thing. Hence, this PR has
removed those changes.
This PR also includes the migration fix originally done by @MrSubidubi
in https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/41351.
## Original PR description and release notes.
**Problem:** Current relative line numbering creates a mismatch with
vim-style navigation when soft wrap is enabled. Users must mentally
calculate whether target lines are wrapped segments or logical lines,
making `<n>j/k` navigation unreliable and cognitively demanding.
**How things work today:**
- Real line navigation (`j/k` moves by logical lines): Requires
determining if visible lines are wrapped segments before jumping. Can't
jump to wrapped lines directly.
- Display line navigation (`j/k` moves by display rows): Line numbers
don't correspond to actual row distances for multi-line jumps.
**Proposed solution:** Count and number each display line (including
wrapped segments) for relative numbering. This creates direct
visual-to-navigational correspondence, where the relative number shown
always matches the `<n>j/k` distance needed.
**Benefits:**
- Eliminates mental overhead of distinguishing wrapped vs. logical lines
- Makes relative line numbers consistently actionable regardless of wrap
state
- Preserves intuitive "what you see is what you navigate" principle
- Maintains vim workflow efficiency in narrow window scenarios
Also explained and discussed in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/discussions/25733.
Release Notes:
- Added support for counting wrapped lines as relative lines and for
displaying line numbers for wrapped segments. Changes
`relative_line_numbers` from a boolean to an enum: `enabled`,
`disabled`, or `wrapped`.
A user on Discord requested this feature:
https://discord.com/channels/869392257814519848/1434188637389717556/1434188637389717556
I added a scrollbar setting called `completion_menu_scrollbar` to the
completion menu and defaulted it to "Never" to match past behavior.
Release Notes:
- editor: Add `editor.completion_menu_scrollbar` setting to show a
scrollbar in the completion menu
Some housekeeping updates:
- Update hardcoded actions/keybindings so they're pulled from the repo
- Mention settings window when useful
- Add more info about agent panel's font size
- Break sentences in individual lines
Release Notes:
- N/A
These have been migrated to the README.md
[here](https://github.com/zed-industries/release_notes). These don't
need to be public. Putting them in the same repo where we draft
(`release_notes`) means less jumping around and allows us to include
additional information we might not want to make public.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes#41422
This completely broke line numbering as described in the linked issue
and scrolling up does not have the correct numbers any more.
Release Notes:
- NOTE: The `relative_line_numbers` change
(https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/39268) was reverted and did
not make the release cut!
Closes#41219
Release Notes:
- Updated docs to use `==` instead of `=` in keymap context.
Hopefully I'm not mistaken here, but I think the docs have a bug in them
Reverts zed-industries/zed#41384
The branch-protection rules work much better when there is a Job that
runs every time and can be depended on to pass, we no longer have this.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Follow up for: #41304
Splits CI tests (cherry-picks and PRs only for now) into separate
workflows using `gh-workflow`. Includes a couple restructures to
- run more things in parallel
- remove our previous shell script based checking to filter tests based
on files changed, instead using the builtin `paths:` workflow filters
Splitting the docs/style/rust tests & checks into separate workflows
means we lose the complete summary showing all the tests in one view,
but it's possible to re-add in the future if we go back to checking what
files changed ourselves or always run everything.
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad <conrad@zed.dev>
Release Notes:
- Remove Windows/Linux from Getting Started
- Consolidate download & system into new Installation page
- Move Remote Dev out of Windows and into Remote Development
- Add Uninstall page
- Add updates page
- Remove addl learning materials from intro
**Problem:** Current relative line numbering creates a mismatch with
vim-style navigation when soft wrap is enabled. Users must mentally
calculate whether target lines are wrapped segments or logical lines,
making `<n>j/k` navigation unreliable and cognitively demanding.
**How things work today:**
- Real line navigation (`j/k` moves by logical lines): Requires
determining if visible lines are wrapped segments before jumping. Can't
jump to wrapped lines directly.
- Display line navigation (`j/k` moves by display rows): Line numbers
don't correspond to actual row distances for multi-line jumps.
**Proposed solution:** Count and number each display line (including
wrapped segments) for relative numbering. This creates direct
visual-to-navigational correspondence where the relative number shown
always matches the `<n>j/k` distance needed.
**Benefits:**
- Eliminates mental overhead of distinguishing wrapped vs. logical lines
- Makes relative line numbers consistently actionable regardless of wrap
state
- Preserves intuitive "what you see is what you navigate" principle
- Maintains vim workflow efficiency in narrow window scenarios
Also explained an discussed in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/discussions/25733.
Release Notes:
Release Notes:
- Added support for counting wrapped lines as relative lines and for
displaying line numbers for wrapped segments. Changes
`relative_line_numbers` from a boolean to an enum: `enabled`,
`disabled`, or `wrapped`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
## Summary
- Document the `stable`/`preview`/`nightly` top-level keys that let
users scope settings overrides per release channel.
- Provide an example `settings.json` snippet and call out that overrides
replace array values rather than merging them.
- Mention that UI-driven changes edit the root config so per-channel
blocks might need manual updates.
## Testing
- Not run (docs only).
Fixes#40458.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: MrSubidubi <finn@zed.dev>
This PR fixes some instances where we were displaying action names in
quotes instead of in backticks.
Also fixed some mentions of using an action to open the settings file,
as this has changed after the release of the settings UI.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Some information in the GDScript documentation page was outdated (like
it still treats Zed if it was a macOS exclusive app) or some details
were missing.
- The `zed-gdscript` URL has been updated with the new owner.
- Pre-requisites added (with netcat included).
- Godot installation steps removed, it's now listed in the
pre-requisites.
- Setup steps simplified and reworded.
The note at the bottom was removed as I didn't see the issue in my end.
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Overview
- document how to keep a per-user debug.json so global launch tasks show
up everywhere (Fixes#39849)
- sanitize REPL terminal text before copying so error blocks can be
copied and opened in buffers (Fixes#40207)
## Design Decisions
- reused the existing user debug file (paths::debug_scenarios_file) and
pointed docs at the zed::OpenDebugTasks command to stay aligned with the
settings UX
- extract a sanitize helper inside TerminalOutput::full_text to strip
\r/null padding while keeping indentation intact, then join the cleaned
lines so clipboard and buffers get readable text
## Testing
- Not run (cargo is unavailable in this environment)
Fixes#39849.
Fixes#40207.
This PR renames the `agent::QuoteSelection` to
`agent::AddSelectionToThread` _and_ adds it as a menu item in both the
right-click context menu within regular buffers as well as the
"Selection" app menu.
We've received feedback in the past about how hard to discover this
feature is, and after watching [the Syntax podcast
crew](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRK3PeVFfVE) recently struggle
with doing so—and then naturally looking for it in the context menu and
not finding it—it felt like time to push a change. I think the rename +
the availability in these places could help bringing it to surface more.
The same action can be done in Cursor through the `cmd-l` keybinding,
but in Zed, that triggers `editor::SelectLine`, which I don't want to
override by default. However, if you're using Cursor's keymap, then
`cmd-l` does trigger this action, as expected.
<img width="500" height="1812" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-22 at 12 01@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dfc2c41c-8d0a-4a1a-8ea1-1bd5d1aa1171"
/>
Release Notes:
- agent: Improves discoverability of the previously called "quote
selection" action—which allows to add a text selection in a buffer as
context within the agent panel—by renaming it to "add selection to
thread" and making it available from the right-click editor context menu
as well as the "Selection" app menu.
The suggested `→` appears tiny, and almost looks like just a dot on my
monitor, and I got quite confused for a while thinking the
`whitespace_map.tab` setting wasn't working properly.
<img width="630" height="105" alt="Image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/98feced2-39b3-4734-83e4-b4573b4e52c2"
/>
I think it would be really helpful if `⟶` was suggested instead since
that displays properly.
<img width="625" height="104" alt="Image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/176886ab-cf88-4079-90a8-91a8e8182092"
/>
---
I am using `Fira Code` as my font on windows, however when I remove that
config to get the default font, it also still appears the same size. So
I don't believe this is just a font issue on my machine.
Thought I am using Windows, so I would be willing to believe this a
render issue specific to windows
Release Notes:
- N/A
