Data migration plan:
- [X] Make a duplicate table of `copilot_events`
- Name: `inline_completion_events`
- Omit `suggestion_id` column
- [X-reverted-skipping] In collab, continue to match on copilot_events,
but simply stuff their data into inline_completion_events, to forward it
to the new table
- [skipping] Once collab is deployed, ensure no events are being sent to
copilot_events, migrate `copilot_events` to new table via a transaction
- [skipping] Delete `copilot_events` table
---
- [X] Locally test that copilot events sent from old clients get put
into inline_completions_table
- [X] Locally test that copilot events and supermaven events sent from
new clients get put into inline_completions_table
---
- [X] Why are discard events being spammed?
- A:
8d4315712b/crates/editor/src/editor.rs (L2147)
This will throw off the past results for accepted / dismissed that I was
wanting to use to evaluate Supermaven quality, by comparing its rate
with copilot's rate.
I'm not super thrilled with this fix, but I think it'll do. In the
`supermaven_completions_provider`, we check if there's a `completion_id`
before sending either an accepted or discard completion event. I don't
see a similar construct in the `copilot_completions_provider` to
piggyback off of, so I begrudgingly introduced
`should_allow_event_to_send` and had it follow the same pattern that
`completion_id` does. Maybe there's a better way?
---
Adds events to supermaven suggestions. Makes "CopilotEvents" generic ->
"InlineCompletionEvents".
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR adjusts the heading levels in the docs, as some of them weren't
following the right hierarchy.
I also formatted all of the docs with Prettier.
Release Notes:
- N/A
